Grammatical Blocking of Universal Uptake in Japanese Ad-vertising Texts: Wake-Framing, Case Restriction, and Event Packaging

Authors

  • Ni Luh Kade Yuliani Giri Universitas Udayana https://orcid.org/0009-0006-0605-7931
  • I Gusti Ayu Gde Sosiowati Universitas Udayana
  • I Wayan Pastika Universitas Udayana
  • Made Ratna Dian Aryani Universitas Udayana

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61132/ijmeal.v3i1.428

Keywords:

Case Framing, Japanese Product-Information Texts, Koto Ga Aru, Rare-Event Marking, Study

Abstract

This study examines Japanese advertising and product-information texts on Shiseido Japan’s official website (www.brand.shiseido.co.jp) that grammatically prevent readers from construing statements as universal claims (“always” or “true for everyone”). It addresses two problems: how universal readings are blocked through grammatical construction in this register, and how the main blocking mechanisms differ in limiting generalisation and managing scope. The data consist of sentence-level usage, precautionary, and quality-related statements that plausibly invite broad general interpretations. Seven analytically representative tokens are used as illustrative evidence, covering wake-negation, baai-based case framing, and event/occasion packaging with V-ru koto ga aru, including rare-event calibration with mare ni and layered conditional framing. The study employs qualitative, theory-driven grammatical analysis focusing on clause structure, embedding, nominalisation, connective relations, and the compositional contribution of key markers. The results identify recurring templates with distinct structural signatures. Wake-negation blocks over-strong uptake by denying a candidate inference (…to iu wake de wa arimasen). Case framing with baai shifts categorical commitments into situation-restricted possibility (…baai ga arimasu), including complex variants that add causal linkage, avoidance marking, and directive closure. Event/occasion packaging with koto plus existential predication (…koto ga arimasu) presents anomalies as contingent occurrences, and it can be triggered by causal conditions (e.g., temperature change) or conditional frames (…to). Rare-event marking with mare ni further calibrates frequency and often co-occurs with contrastive reassurance about quality. Overall, universal-blocking emerges as a set of non-redundant grammatical routes that constrain inference, situational domain, and event profiling in a compact public informational genre.

References

Akuzawa, K., & Kubota, Y. (2021). Against finite raising (and against defective tense): A semantic analysis of -yooni naru in Japanese. Gengo, 160, 249–261. https://doi.org/10.11435/gengo.160.0

Asami, D., & Delaware, U. (2024). Deriving and processing experiencer subject causatives. Journal Name, 9(1), 1–57.

Chen, Y. (2024). An experimental investigation into the scope assignment of Japanese and Chinese quantifier‑negation sen-tences. Journal Name.

Clancy, P. M. (2020). To link or not to link: Clause chaining in Japanese narratives. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03008

Daisuke, Y. (2024). Kedo-ending turn format as a formula for a problem statement with a deontic implication. Journal Name.

Date, U. E. (2023). Projective/retrospective linking of a contrastive idea: Interactional practices of turn-initial and turn-final uses of kedo ‘but’ in Japanese. Journal Name.

Espinal, M. T. (2024). A new approach to negative concord: Catalan as a. Journal Name, 60, 757–789. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226723000233

Etxeberria, U., Espinal, M. T., & Tubau, S. (2024). Establishing the limits between polarity sensitivity, negative polarity and negative concord. Lingty, 28(2), 331–366. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2022-0083

Heine, B., & Narrog, H. (n.d.). Oxford handbooks online: Oxford handbooks in linguistics.

Hideki, K., & Kazushige, M. (2025). Adverbial particle modification and argument ellipsis in Japanese. Journal Name.

Ido, M., & Kubota, Y. (2021). The hidden side of exclusive focus particles: An analysis of dake and sika in Japanese. Gengo, 2018, 183–213. https://doi.org/10.11435/gengo.160.0

Ihara, S. (2021). Division of labor between semantics and pragmatics of canonical and non-canonical imperatives. Gengo, 17, 155–182. https://doi.org/10.11435/gengo.160.0

Ihara, S. (2022). A note on licencing contrastive topics with universal quantifiers. Journal Name, 2021, 1–15.

Kaiser, S., Ichikawa, Y., Kobayashi, N., & Yamamoto, H. (2001). Japanese: A comprehensive grammar. London & New York: Routledge.

Kumashiro, T. (n.d.). Grammar of Japanese clause structure.

Le Bruyn, B. (2025). Exceptional wide scope of bare nominals *. Semantics & Pragmatics, 15(7), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.3765/sp.15.7

Ling, P., & Amer, S. (2022). On the properties of expressivity and counter-expectation in the Japanese minimizer NPI. Journal Name, 7(March), 1–15.

Ling, P., & Amer, S. (2023). Varieties of wh-exclamatives: A view from the negative wh-expressives in Japanese Osamu Sawada. Journal Name, 8(21).

Narrog, H. (2009). Modality in Japanese. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Nishioka, N. (2004). Quantifiers and negation: A minimalist approach to partial negation. Journal Name, 2, 323–347.

Osamu, S. (2025). Kernel scalarity of the Japanese initial mora-based minimizer: A compositional (lexically unspecified) minimizer and a non-compositional (lexically specified) minimizer. Journal Name, 2.

Pizziconi, B., & Kizu, M. (Eds.). (n.d.). Japanese modality. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.

Polakof, A. C. (2021). The negation of cualquier NP. Journal Name, 4138, 1–24.

Ramat, P., & Pessoa, F. (2022). Expletive negation and related problems. Journal Name, 2, 1–38.

Sawada, O. (2021). The Japanese reactive attitudinal Nani-mo: A new class of negative polarity items. Gengo, 2019, 43–68. https://doi.org/10.11435/gengo.160.0

Shibatani, M. (1976). Syntax and semantics: Japanese generative grammar. New York: Academic Press.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-30

How to Cite

Ni Luh Kade Yuliani Giri, I Gusti Ayu Gde Sosiowati, I Wayan Pastika, & Made Ratna Dian Aryani. (2025). Grammatical Blocking of Universal Uptake in Japanese Ad-vertising Texts: Wake-Framing, Case Restriction, and Event Packaging. International Journal of Multilingual Education and Applied Linguistics, 3(1), 13–28. https://doi.org/10.61132/ijmeal.v3i1.428