Analysis of Grammatical Errors in English BI Reports Written By Eleventh-Grade Hospitality Students of SMK Negeri 2 Kuta Selatan

Authors

  • I Gede Esa Ananda Universitas Udayana
  • I Wayan Simpen Universitas Udayana
  • Ni Ketut Widhiarcani Matradewi Universitas Udayana

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61132/ijmeal.v3i3.479

Keywords:

BI Report, English Writing, Error Analysis, Grammatical Errors, Grammatical Interference

Abstract

This study investigates grammatical errors in English BI Reports written by eleventh-grade hospitality students at SMK Negeri 2 Kuta Selatan. The study aims to identify the types of grammatical errors and determine the most dominant errors in students’ writing. A descriptive qualitative design was employed, involving 111 students from three hospitality classes. Data were collected from students’ BI Reports and analyzed through error identification, classification, and frequency calculation. The errors were categorized into seven types: tenses, subject–verb agreement, plural forms, articles, sentence structure, prepositions, and word order. A total of 111 grammatical errors were identified. Tense errors were the most frequent, accounting for 21 errors (18.92%), followed by subject–verb agreement and plural errors (18 errors each, 16.22%), article and sentence structure errors (17 errors each, 15.32%), and preposition and word order errors (10 errors each, 9.01%). The findings indicate that students continue to experience difficulties applying English grammar, particularly the simple past tense, mainly due to Indonesian language interference and limited grammatical knowledge. These results highlight the need for contextual grammar instruction and writing practice tailored to hospitality contexts to improve students’ grammatical accuracy.

References

Brown, H. D. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching (5th ed.). Pearson Education.

Corder, S. P. (1981). Error analysis and interlanguage. Oxford University Press.

Dulay, H., Burt, M., & Krashen, S. (1982). Language two. Oxford University Press.

Ellis, R. (1997). Second language acquisition. Oxford University Press.

Harmer, J. (2007). The practice of English language teaching (4th ed.). Pearson Longman.

James, C. (1998). Errors in language learning and use: Exploring error analysis. Longman.

Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Pergamon Press.

Krashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis. Longman.

Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (2013). A communicative grammar of English (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315836041

Nunan, D. (2003). Practical English language teaching. McGraw-Hill. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667336

Richards, J. C., & Schmidt, R. (2010). Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics (4th ed.). Pearson Education.

Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 10(1–4), 209–231. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.1972.10.1-4.209

Swan, M. (2016). Practical English usage (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.

Tarigan, H. G., & Tarigan, D. (2011). Pengajaran analisis kesalahan berbahasa. Angkasa.

Wardhaugh, R., & Fuller, J. M. (2015). An introduction to sociolinguistics (7th ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.

Weinreich, U. (1970). Languages in contact. Mouton.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-01

How to Cite

Ananda, I. G. E., I Wayan Simpen, & Ni Ketut Widhiarcani Matradewi. (2026). Analysis of Grammatical Errors in English BI Reports Written By Eleventh-Grade Hospitality Students of SMK Negeri 2 Kuta Selatan. International Journal of Multilingual Education and Applied Linguistics, 3(3), 01–07. https://doi.org/10.61132/ijmeal.v3i3.479