Professionalism and Popularity in the Digital Age: A Netnographic Study of Teachers' Ethics and Self-Aesthetics as Educational Content Creators on TikTok

Authors

  • Hasnah Faizah Universitas Riau
  • Desi Yusnita Mailinda Universitas Riau
  • Chindy Anjeli Universitas Riau
  • Erma Roza Universitas Riau
  • Asmadi Asmadi Universitas Riau

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61132/ijets.v2i3.400

Keywords:

Aesthetics, Digital Professionalism, Educational Philosophy, Ethics, TikTok

Abstract

This study examines the phenomenon of creator teachers on TikTok as a form of digital professionalism that represents the integration of ethical values, aesthetics, and educational philosophy. The focus of the research lies in how teachers negotiate moral responsibility and creative expression in the algorithmic culture of social media. The aim of this research is to analyze the philosophical meaning behind teachers' digital representations as well as interpret how moral and aesthetic values are reflected in their pedagogical practices. The method used is digital netnography with four stages: online observation, digital documentation, audience interaction analysis, and researcher reflection. A total of eight teacher accounts were analyzed with a total of 80 videos using a categorization of themes that focused on ethics, aesthetics, and professionalism. The results showed that 62.5% of the content was educational and featured learning innovations, while the other 37.5% contained elements of entertainment and social interaction. High audience interaction shows public appreciation for the creativity and integrity of teachers. Popularity is not solely generated by algorithms, but by the appreciation of moral values and pedagogical beauty in the actions of teachers. Based on the framework of arete and phronesis from Aristotle and the concept of aesthetic experience from Dewey (1934), this study concludes that the digital professionalism of teachers is a form of reflective praxis that combines ethical responsibility and creative expression. This research makes a theoretical contribution by integrating digital netnography and educational philosophy, and shows that teachers in the digital era play the role of moral and creative agents who maintain the dignity of their profession in the algorithmic space.

References

Amsrud, M. B. (2023). Internet research ethics – Resources and challenges: A qualitative study.

Anggawirya. (2025). Representation of cultural values in digital content through a grounded theory approach to cultural creators on TikTok. MUKASI: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 4(2), 119–131. https://doi.org/10.54259/mukasi.v4i2.4257

Backlinko. (2024). TikTok users: How many people use TikTok in 2024? Backlinko. Retrieved October 12, 2025, from https://backlinko.com/tiktok-users

Brandão, A., Pedro, L., & Zagalo, N. (2024). Teacher professional development for a future with generative artificial intelligence: An integrative literature review. Digital Education Review, (45), 151–157. https://doi.org/10.1344/der.2024.45.151-157

Chen, S. (2020). The stages of moral education in Aristotle’s Ethics and Politics. Rhizomata, 7(1), 97–118. https://doi.org/10.1515/rhiz-2019-0004

Dewey, J. (1934). Art as experience. New York: Minton, Balch & Company.

Fahman, Z. (2024). Social studies in education: Transformasi sosial dalam pendidikan karakter di era digital—Peluang dan tantangan. Social Studies in Education, 2(2), 191–206.*

Govindarajoo, M. V. V., Nair, S. M., Sekhon, R. S., Wai, C. S., Hoong, L. C., Huat, T. B., & Okawa, T. (2025). Exploring teachers’ views on benefits, ethical issues, and challenges in integrating AI tools in Malaysian schools. Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, 9(9), 699–710. https://doi.org/10.55214/2576-8484.v9i9.9935

Haliza, S. N. (2024). Etika profesi keguruan: Tanggung jawab dan tantangan moral guru. Qalam Lil Mubtadiin, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.58822/qlm.v2i2.214

Haroen, D. (2014). Personal branding. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Hitz, Z. (2013). Aristotle on law and moral education. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 42. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199644384.003.0007

Maghfiroh, D. L., & Mustofa, A. (2023). Refleksi sosial dan kontemplasi pendidikan karakter dalam novel Sampah di Laut, Meira karya Mawan Belgia. Diglossia: Jurnal Kajian Ilmiah Kebahasaan dan Kesusastraan, 14(2), 86–103. https://doi.org/10.26594/diglossia.v14i2.2077

Mahanal, S. (2017). Peran guru dalam melahirkan generasi emas dengan keterampilan abad 21. Seminar Nasional Pendidikan HMPS Pendidikan Biologi FKIP Universitas Halu Oleo, 1(September 2014), 1–16.*

Meletiou-Mavrotheris, M., Bakogianni, D., Danidou, Y., Paparistodemou, E., & Kofteros, A. (2025). Investigating student teacher engagement with data-driven AI and ethical reasoning in a graduate-level education course. Education Sciences, 15(9), 1179. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15091179

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook.

Mubarok, A. S., Nurazizah, Z., Herawan, E., & Putri, D. P. (2025). Deep learning with project-based learning (PjBL) model for student creativity. Pedagogia: Jurnal Pendidikan, 14(2), 239–252. https://doi.org/10.21070/pedagogia.v14i2.1957

Mustapa, A., Ramadhani, K., Dewi, L. P., Oktarina, N., & Widodo, J. (2025). Implementasi pendekatan pembelajaran kurikulum merdeka: Understanding by Design, berdiferensiasi, dan deep learning. Pendas: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 10(2), 427–441. https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v10i02.25134

OECD. (2025). Teaching and learning international survey (TALIS) 2024 conceptual framework. https://doi.org/10.1787/7b8f85d4-en

Sánchez-López, I., Roig-Vila, R., & Manotas Salcedo, E. (2023). Teachers on TikTok: Creative strategies and resources for making content go viral—An evolution in education? Analisi, 69, 93–112. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/analisi.3634

Sarfo, J. O. (2017). A book review: Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches. Russian Journal of Sociology, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.13187/rjs.2017.1.30

Swindell, A., Greeley, L., Farag, A., & Verdone, B. (2024). Against artificial education: Towards an ethical framework for generative artificial intelligence (AI) use in education. Online Learning Journal, 28(2), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v28i2.4438

Tamrin, A. (2019). Relasi ilmu, filsafat, dan agama dalam dimensi filsafat ilmu. SALAM: Jurnal Sosial dan Budaya Syar-I, 6(1), 71–96. https://doi.org/10.15408/sjsbs.v6i1.10490

Vizcaíno-Verdú, A., & Abidin, C. (2023). TeachTok: Teachers of TikTok, micro-celebrification, and fun learning communities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 123, Article 103978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103978

Zhang, H., Xiong, X., Guo, L., Wang, X., Ye, T., Wang, X., & Ma, S. (2025). Posthumanist challenges and opportunities for teachers in the era of artificial intelligence. Journal of Posthumanism, 5(3), 673–683. https://doi.org/10.63332/joph.v5i3.775

Downloads

Published

2025-09-30

How to Cite

Hasnah Faizah, Desi Yusnita Mailinda, Chindy Anjeli, Erma Roza, & Asmadi, A. (2025). Professionalism and Popularity in the Digital Age: A Netnographic Study of Teachers’ Ethics and Self-Aesthetics as Educational Content Creators on TikTok . International Journal of Educational Technology and Society, 2(3), 37–45. https://doi.org/10.61132/ijets.v2i3.400