Evaluating Sustainable Educational Technology Adoption Models to Bridge Institutional Innovation and Community Driven Learning Practices

Authors

  • Tiwuk Widiastuti Umiversitas Nusa Cendana
  • Dewantoro Lase Politeknik Negeri Media Kreatif
  • Firman Pratama Universitas Pamulang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61132/ijets.v2i3.464

Keywords:

Community Learning, Educational Technology, Participatory Decision Making, Sustainability Models, Technology Adoption

Abstract

This study explores the integration of community driven learning practices in the adoption of educational technology and its impact on sustainability. With the rapid advancement of digital tools and platforms, higher education institutions have increasingly adopted online and hybrid learning models to enhance teaching and learning. However, despite the potential benefits, aligning institutional goals with community needs remains a significant challenge. This research utilizes a mixed methods approach, combining stakeholder surveys, policy analysis, and comparative case studies to evaluate the effectiveness of both top down and community aligned adoption models. The findings reveal that community driven models, which involve local stakeholders in the decision making process, lead to higher engagement, better adoption rates, and greater long term sustainability compared to top down approaches. Stakeholders, including educators, students, and administrators, reported that participatory decision making fostered a sense of ownership and ensured the relevance of adopted technologies. The study also identifies key sustainability factors, including participatory decision making, long term community engagement, and contextual relevance, which are crucial for ensuring that educational technologies remain effective and beneficial over time. However, challenges such as resistance to change, lack of resources, and unequal access to technology were found to hinder the successful implementation of sustainable models. The research concludes with practical recommendations for educational institutions and policymakers to adopt community aligned models and ensure equitable access to technology. Future research directions are suggested to further explore the balance between institutional innovation and community driven learning, with a focus on long term outcomes and the adaptability of these models across different educational contexts.

References

Ahmad, S., Mohd Noor, A. S., Alwan, A. A., Gulzar, Y., Khan, W. Z., & Reegu, F. A. (2023). eLearning acceptance and adoption challenges in higher education. Sustainability, 15(7), 6190. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15076190

Ali, R. (2024). Drivers and barriers for institutional adoption and diffusion of blended learning in higher education. In Digital Transformation in Higher Education (pp. 42–58). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-9388-4_5

Alsbury, T. L., Kobashigawa, S., & Ewart, M. (2020). Community-based learning and student outcomes: What research reveals. Urban Education and Cultural Communities, 1, 124–145. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004424494_003

Andrade, M. S., Workman, L., & Westover, J. H. (2022). Current practices for community-based learning in schools of business. International Journal of Management Education, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2021.100597

Belanova, N., & Popok, L. (2025). Innovations and quality of learning in the higher education system. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 1552 LNNS, 148–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-99598-9_22

Berde, É., Mengesha, S. T., Mola, B. A., & Remsei, S. (2024). Massive open online courses (MOOCs) for Ethiopian educators: Evaluating MOOCs as a global development tool. Research Global, 9, 100263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resglo.2024.100263

Chasokela, D., & Ncube, C. M. (2024). Leveraging technology for organizational efficiency and effectiveness in higher education. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-6967-8.ch014

Deacon, B., Laufer, M., & Schäfer, L. O. (2023). Infusing educational technologies in the heart of the university—A systematic literature review from an organisational perspective. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54(2), 441–466. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13277

Gómez, M. R. B., & Fernández-Samacá, L. (2025). Bridging innovation and sustainability in engineering education: Work in progress. In International Symposium on Project Approaches in Engineering Education (pp. 156–162). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15850324

Hansen, S. E. W. (2018). Improving educational and financial effectiveness through innovation: A case study of Southern New Hampshire University’s College for America. International Journal of Educational Development, 58, 149–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2017.04.006

Hermann, R. R., Bonzanini Bossle, M., Aleixo Costa, M. A., & Neutzling, D. M. (2025). Education for sustainable development goals through service learning: A university-community collaboration in northeast Brazil. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-11-2024-0776

Huda, S., Alyahya, S., Pan, L., & Al-Dossari, H. (2022). Combining innovative technology and context-based approaches in teaching software engineering. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 13(10), 305–314. https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2022.0131037

Kumar, P., Keppell, M. J., & Lim, C. L. (2019). Preparing 21st century teachers for Teach Less, Learn More (TLLM) pedagogies. In Handbook of Research on Effective Communication, Leadership, and Conflict Resolution (pp. 1–23). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-1435-1

Kurkovsky, A. (2015). Simulation approach to support sustainability of higher education. Simulation Series, 9–10. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84937805367&partnerID=40&md5=ed8fd0a99ea66d224fbcca66fb020d77

Lake, D., Motley, P. M., & Moner, W. (2022). Completing the CiCLE: Long-term assessment of community-involved collaborative learning ecosystems for social innovation in higher education. Social Enterprise Journal, 18(1), 28–50. https://doi.org/10.1108/SEJ-10-2020-0089

Longoria, L. C., López-Forniés, I., Sáenz, D. C., & Sierra-Pérez, J. (2021). Promoting sustainable consumption in higher education institutions through integrative co-creative processes involving relevant stakeholders. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 28, 445–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.06.009

Mineva, O. K., & Polyanskaya, E. V. (2021). Formation of modern open educational space. In CEUR Workshop Proceedings (pp. 211–216). https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85122782899&partnerID=40&md5=e5304c10bd7758462e8d0217288b176f

Nesmith, S. M., Scott, L. M., LeCompte, K. N., & Johnsen, S. K. (2020). Connecting learning to the community: Pedagogical strategies for educators. Urban Education and Cultural Communities, 1, 172–194. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004424494_005

Opanasiuk, Y., Kobushko, I., & Kostyuk, A. (2025). What is community-engaged learning? Theoretical and pedagogical background. 1. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035315079.00010

Oulamine, A., et al. (2025). A systematic literature review of barriers affecting e-learning in higher education. Educational Process International Journal, 17, 396. https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2025.17.396

Piliouras, T., et al. (2015). Reflections on academic culture & the role of technology and major stakeholders. In ISEC 2015 - 5th IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference (pp. 266–271). https://doi.org/10.1109/ISECon.2015.7119937

Reid, J. R., & Baker, R. S. (2018). Designing and testing an educational innovation. Pediatric Radiology, 48(10), 1406–1409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-018-4193-x

Ruiz-Cantisani, M. I., Lara-Prieto, V., Mendoza, A. G. R., Rodriguez-Rosales, A., Garcia-Garcia, R., & Membrillo-Hernandez, J. (2024). Engineering of the future: The influence of educational innovation. In 2024 World Engineering Education Forum - Global Engineering Deans Council (WEEF-GEDC 2024). https://doi.org/10.1109/WEEF-GEDC63419.2024.10854957

Sabiteka, M., Yu, X., & Sun, C. (2025). Toward sustainable education: A contextualized model for educational technology adoption for developing countries. Sustainability, 17(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/su17083592

Saidu, A. A., Idris, M. K., & Ahmed, A. A. (2024). The role of technology for academic transformation in the post-COVID-19 era. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3373-0508-0.ch001

Scott, L. M., LeCompte, K. N., Nesmith, S. M., & Johnsen, S. K. (2020). Community-based pedagogical strategies with students and for educators. Urban Education and Cultural Communities, 1, 149–171. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004424494_004

Singh, G., Syan, A. S., Chawla, S., Gulati, S., & Jaggi, S. (2024). Deepening knowledge of digitalization and sustainability of education: An overview of challenges and solutions. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85200899544&partnerID=40&md5=e0a2f5071e908cb12b00353b90564c7f

Whittaker, J. A., & Montgomery, B. L. (2022). Advancing a cultural change agenda in higher education: Issues and values related to reimagining academic leadership. Discover Sustainability, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-022-00079-6

Woldemariam, Â. M. T., Ergado, A. A., & Jimma, W. (2025). Educational technology integration strategies in colleges of teacher education in Ethiopia. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 51(1). https://doi.org/10.21432/cjlt28880

Wong, J. M. S., & Li, K. C. (2025). Technology-enabled institutional readiness for agile-blended learning: A framework for educational innovation. SN Computer Science, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-025-03822-8

Downloads

Published

2026-03-02

How to Cite

Tiwuk Widiastuti, Dewantoro Lase, & Firman Pratama. (2026). Evaluating Sustainable Educational Technology Adoption Models to Bridge Institutional Innovation and Community Driven Learning Practices. International Journal of Educational Technology and Society, 2(3), 55–64. https://doi.org/10.61132/ijets.v2i3.464