Hegemonic Masculinity in The Super Mario Bros (2023)

Authors

  • Anggi Khairizah Harahap Universitas Negeri Medan
  • Morada Tetty Universitas Negeri Medan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61132/ijed.v2i4.402

Keywords:

Animated Film, Bowser, Gender, Hegemonic Masculinity, Masculinity

Abstract

This study explores the representation of hegemonic masculinity in The Super Mario Bros (2023), focusing on the character Bowser as a central figure of dominance and authority. Using Connell’s (2005) theory of hegemonic masculinity, this research identifies the masculine traits manifested through Bowser’s verbal and non-verbal expressions. The study employed a qualitative descriptive method with textual analysis on thirty selected scenes from the film. The findings reveal that Bowser exhibits all seven traits of hegemonic masculinity, including aggression and competition, dominance and control, physical strength, emotional restraint, risk-taking, sexual conquest, and self-confidence. Among these, aggression and competition (23.3%) and dominance and control (20%) are the most prominent. Bowser’s masculinity reflects how patriarchal ideals are embedded within modern animated cinema, emphasizing control, strength, and emotional suppression. This study contributes to the understanding of how traditional masculinity continues to be reproduced in contemporary media, influencing audience perceptions of male identity and power.

References

Beynon, J. (2002). Masculinities and culture. Open University Press.

Bird, S. R. (1996). Welcome to the men’s club: Homosociality and the maintenance of hegemonic masculinity. Gender & Society, 10(2), 120–132.

Connell, R. W. (2005). Masculinities (2nd ed.). University of California Press.

Connell, R. W., & Messerschmidt, J. W. (2005). Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept. Gender & Society, 19(6), 829–859.

Daffa, M., & Amelia, D. (2024). Character archetypes in The Super Mario Bros (2023). Journal of Media and Cultural Studies, 5(2), 34–45.

Faziel, H. (2024). Representation of hegemonic masculinity in Avatar (2009). International Journal of Gender Studies, 3(1), 12–25.

Gerke, S. (2022). Gender representations in contemporary animated films. Media Studies Review, 10(3), 102–115.

Gill, R. (2007). Gender and the media. Polity Press.

Johnson, J., & Repta, R. (2011). Sex and gender: Beyond the binaries. Social Health Review, 4(2), 24–33.

Katz, J. (2011). Tough guise 2: Violence, manhood, and American culture [Film]. Media Education Foundation.

Kimmel, M. (2004). Masculinity studies and feminist theory: New directions. Routledge.

Lubis, A. R., Eryani, I. A., & Solin, M. (2024). Representation of masculinity in Barbie (2023) movie. Indonesian Journal of Gender and Culture, 2(1), 56–68.

MacInnes, J. (1998). The end of masculinity: The confusion of sexual genesis and sexual difference in modern society. Open University Press.

Messerschmidt, J. W. (2018). Hegemonic masculinity: Formulation, reformulation, and implication. Rowman & Littlefield.

Mulvey, L. (1975). Visual pleasure and narrative cinema. Screen, 16(3), 6–18.

Penny, R. (2020). The power of representation: Masculinity and media. Critical Media Journal, 15(2), 89–104.

Pleck, J. (1981). The myth of masculinity. MIT Press.

Pratama, D. (2023). The construction of male power in superhero movies. Cinema and Gender Studies Journal, 8(1), 45–59.

Schrock, D., & Schwalbe, M. (2009). Men, masculinity, and manhood acts. Annual Review of Sociology, 35, 277–295.

Wedgwood, N. (2009). Connell's theory of masculinity: Its origins and influences. Journal of Gender Studies, 18(4), 329–339.

Wood, J. T. (2013). Gendered lives: Communication, gender, and culture (10th ed.). Wadsworth Cengage Learning.

Zhang, W. (2021). Masculinity in animation: A critical discourse analysis of Disney and Pixar films. Asian Journal of Cultural Studies, 14(2), 77–93.

Downloads

Published

2025-10-31

How to Cite

Anggi Khairizah Harahap, & Morada Tetty. (2025). Hegemonic Masculinity in The Super Mario Bros (2023). International Journal of Educational Development, 2(4), 08–11. https://doi.org/10.61132/ijed.v2i4.402