ChatGPT For Positive Impact? Examining the Opportunities and Challenges of Large Language Models in Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61132/ijed.v1i3.75Keywords:
AI Applications, Challenges, Education, Ethical Use, Large Language ModelsAbstract
Researchers argues that large language models are critical to the advancement of artificial intelligence and will play a vital role in future progress. Despite criticism and occasional bans, these models are persistent and poised to continue. This analysis delves into the potential benefits and challenges of utilising extensive language models in education, considering perspectives from both students and educators. These models' current status and applications are briefly reviewed, emphasising their use in generating educational material, increasing student engagement, and personalising learning experiences. The discussed challenges include the need for educators and students to develop skills and literacies to understand and navigate the technology and its limitations. Employing a strategic and pedagogical approach that stresses critical thinking and fact-checking is a crucial component of effectively integrating these models into educational institutions. AI applications in education often encounter additional challenges, including potential biases, the necessity for ongoing human oversight, and the risks of misuse. However, these challenges may present educational opportunities for students to become familiar with social biases, complexities, and risks associated with AI. The essay presents solutions for effectively addressing these challenges to ensure the responsible and ethical use of large language models in education.
References
Abdelghani, R., Wang, Y.-H., Yuan, X., Wang, T., Sauzéon, H., & Oudeyer, P.-Y. (2022). GPT-3-driven pedagogical agents for training children’s curious question-asking skills. arXiv. preprint arXiv:2211.14228.
Ahuja, A. S., Polascik, B. W., Doddapaneni, D., Byrnes, E. S., & Sridhar, J. (2023). The digital metaverse: Applications in artificial intelligence, medical education, and integrative health. Integrative Medicine Research, 12(1), Article 100917.
Ayanwale, M. A., Sanusi, I. T., Adelana, O. P., Aruleba, K. D., & Oyelere, S. S. (2022). Teachers’ readiness and intention to teach artificial intelligence in schools. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, Article 100099.
Bao, M. (2019). Can home use of speech-enabled artificial intelligence mitigate foreign language anxiety–investigation of a concept. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), (Special Issue on CALL), 5.
Becker, B. A., Denny, P., Finnie-Ansley, J., Luxton-Reilly, A., Prather, J., & Santos, E. A. (2022). Programming is hard–or at least it used to be: Educational opportunities and challenges of ai code generation. arXiv. preprint arXiv:2212.01020.
Bernius, J. P., Krusche, S., & Bruegge, B. (2022). Machine learning based feedback on textual student answers in large courses. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3.
Bhat, S., Nguyen, H. A., Moore, S., Stamper, J., Sakr, M., & Nyberg, E. (2022). Towards automated generation and evaluation of questions in educational domains. In Proceedings of the 15th international conference on educational data mining (pp. 701–704). Durham, United Kingdom: International Educational Data Mining Society.
Borisov, V., Seßler, K., Leemann, T., Pawelczyk, M., & Kasneci, G. (2022). Language models are realistic tabular data generators. arXiv. preprint arXiv:2210.06280.
Brown, T., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J. D., Dhariwal, P., Neelakantan, A., Shyam, P., Sastry, G., Askell, A., et al. (2020). Language models are few-shot learners. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33, 1877–1901.
Chocarro, R., Cortinas, M., & Marcos-Matas, G. (2021). Teachers’ attitudes towards chatbots in education: A technology acceptance model approach considering the effect of social language, bot proactiveness, and users’ characteristics. Educational Studies, 1–19.
Choi, S., Jang, Y., & Kim, H. (2023). Influence of pedagogical beliefs and perceived trust on teachers’ acceptance of educational artificial intelligence tools. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 39(4), 910–922.
Cotton, D. R., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. (2023). Chatting and cheating. In Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. EdArXiv.
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2018). BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. arXiv. preprint arXiv:1810.04805.
Dijkstra, R., Genç, Z., Kayal, S., & Kamps, J. (2022). Reading comprehension quiz generation using generative pre-trained transformers. https://e.humanities.uva.nl/publications/2022/dijk_read22.pdf.
El Shazly, R. (2021). Effects of artificial intelligence on english speaking anxiety and speaking performance: A case study. Expert Systems, 38(3), Article e12667.
Elkins, K., & Chun, J. (2020). Can GPT-3 pass a writer’s turing test? Journal of Cultural Analytics, 5, 17212.
Fadel, C., Holmes, W., & Bialik, M. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. The Center for Curriculum Redesign.
Floridi, L., & Chiriatti, M. (2020). GPT-3: Its nature, scope, limits, and consequences. Minds and Machines, 30(4), 681–694.
Gabajiwala, E., Mehta, P., Singh, R., & Koshy, R. (2022). Quiz maker: Automatic quiz generation from text using NLP. In Futuristic trends in networks and computing technologies (pp. 523–533). Singapore: Springer.
Gao, C. A., Howard, F. M., Markov, N. S., Dyer, E. C., Ramesh, S., Luo, Y., & Pearson, A. T. (2022). Comparing scientific abstracts generated by ChatGPT to original abstracts using an artificial intelligence output detector, plagiarism detector, and blinded human reviewers. bioRxiv.
Gao, H., Bozkir, E., Hasenbein, L., Hahn, J.-U., Gollner, R., & Kasneci, E. (2021). Digital transformations of classrooms in virtual reality. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1–10).
Gu, C., Huang, C., Zheng, X., Chang, K.-W., & Hsieh, C.-J. (2022). Watermarking pre-trained language models with backdooring. arXiv. preprint arXiv:2210.07543.
Guzman, A. L., & Lewis, S. C. (2020). Artificial intelligence and communication: A human–machine communication research agenda. New Media & Society, 22(1), 70–86.
Hwang, G.-J., & Chang, C.-Y. (2021). A review of opportunities and challenges of chatbots in education. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–14.
Jeon, J. (2021). Chatbot-assisted dynamic assessment (ca-da) for l2 vocabulary learning and diagnosis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1–27.
Ji, H., Han, I., & Ko, Y. (2022). A systematic review of conversational ai in language education: Focusing on the collaboration with human teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 1–16.
Jia, Q., Cui, J., Xiao, Y., Liu, C., Rashid, P., & Gehringer, E. F. (2021). ALL-IN-ONE: Multi-task learning BERT models for evaluating peer assessments. International Educational Data Mining Society.
Kerr, J., & Lawson, G. (2020). Augmented reality in design education: Landscape architecture studies as ar experience. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 39(1), 6–21.
Kirchenbauer, J., Geiping, J., Wen, Y., Katz, J., Miers, I., & Goldstein, T. (2023). A watermark for large language models. arXiv. preprint arXiv:2301.10226v1.
Kuhlthau, C. C., Maniotes, L. K., & Caspari, A. K. (2015). Guided inquiry: Learning in the 21st century: Learning in the 21st century. Abc-Clio.
Kung, T. H., Cheatham, M., Medenilla, A., Sillos, C., De Leon, L., Elepano, C., Madriaga, M., Aggabao, R., Diaz-Candido, G., Maningo, J., & Tseng, V. (2022). Performance of ChatGPT on USMLE: Potential for AI-assisted medical education using large language models. medRxiv.
Lin, C.-J., & Mubarok, H. (2021). Learning analytics for investigating the mind map-guided AI chatbot approach in an efl flipped speaking classroom. Educational Technology & Society, 24(4), 16–35.
Liu, Y., Ott, M., Goyal, N., Du, J., Joshi, M., Chen, D., Levy, O., Lewis, M., Zettlemoyer, L., & Stoyanov, V. (2019). Roberta: A robustly optimized bert pretraining approach. arXiv. preprint arXiv:1907.11692.
MacNeil, S., Tran, A., Mogil, D., Bernstein, S., Ross, E., & Huang, Z. (2022). Generating diverse code explanations using the GPT-3 large language model. In Proceedings of the 2022 ACM conference on international computing education research - Volume 1 (pp. 4–14).
Mallinas, S. R., Maner, J. K., & Sokolowski, K. L. (2023). Examining the effect of language model technology on student experiences of academic entitlement. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 9(1), 75–86.
Murison, M. (2022). Machine learning improves math performance in high school classrooms. https://news.mit.edu/2022/machine-learning-high-school-math-1128.
Ou-Yang, L., Chang, W.-C., Ma, T., & Chang, K.-Y. (2022). Prompting GPT-3 to be reliable. arXiv. preprint arXiv:2205.00299.
Paul, S., Benwell, C. S. Y., Allison, C., Baron-Cohen, S., & Warrier, V. (2023). ChatGPT and the impact on artificial intelligence education: Opinions of university students, educators, and professionals. Patterns, 4(2), Article 100676.
Popenici, S. A., & Kerr, S. (2017). Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on teaching and learning in higher education. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 12, 22.
Rashid, A., Kamal, R., & Kim, J. (2022). An empirical investigation of the impact of an AI-powered English learning app on the development of English language skills. Sustainability, 14(24), Article 16857.
Roll, I., & Wylie, R. (2016). Evolution and revolution in artificial intelligence in education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26(2), 582–599.
Sabry, H. A., Iqbal, R., Mollah, M. B., & O'Shea, D. J. (2022). A comprehensive review on chatbots as educational means: Enhancing student engagement, feedback, and performance. Education and Information Technologies, 27(5), 6031–6056.
Sheng, E., Chang, K.-W., & Peng, N. (2020). Towards robustness of pretrained language models via adversarial fine-tuning. arXiv. preprint arXiv:2004.00555.
Smutny, P., & Schreiberova, P. (2020). Chatbots for learning: A review of educational chatbots for the facebook messenger. Computers & Education, 151, Article 103862.
Tamayo, M., Duran, J., Alandete, A., & Sicilia, M. Á. (2022). Learning analytics and educational data mining techniques in artificial intelligence tools: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 27(4), 5089–5112.
Van Leeuwen, C., Gerling, K., Shute, V. J., & Richter, G. (2021). Gamified education: The effect of leaderboard design on goal orientation. Information, 12(3), Article 105.
Wang, Y., Deng, B., & Liu, D. (2022). Challenges and countermeasures in applying artificial intelligence in language education. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 12(1), 1–17.
Zha, Y., Gao, Y., Liang, P., & Lang, C. (2021). Understanding teachers’ technology adoption in a learning context: A case study of live class delivery amid the COVID-19 crisis. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 37(6), 117–134.
Zhai, C., Zhang, B., & Wu, J. (2022). Educational impact of language models: Examining ethical considerations and unintended consequences. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 32(4), 1024–1056.
Zhao, W., & Liao, C. (2021). Chatbot-based tutoring systems: A study of different conversational designs. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–14.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 International Journal of Educational Development
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
